Cross-Disciplinary Integration in Senior High School English Curricu-lum Design: Current Status and Path Exploration

Hui Li

doi:10.63313/EDU.8014

Authors

Hui Li School of Foreign Languages, China West Normal University, NanChong 637009, China Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63313/EDU.8014

Keywords:

Cross-disciplinary integration, Senior high school English, Curriculum design

Abstract

This paper examines the current state of cross-disciplinary integration in senior high school English education and explores strategies for enhancing this inte-gration. Despite growing recognition of its importance, challenges such as teacher training, assessment systems, and resource limitations persist. The pa-per proposes theme-based curriculum design, project-based learning, and the use of information technology as effective paths forward. It also highlights the importance of teacher collaboration and community engagement. These ap-proaches aim to provide a more holistic educational experience, aligning with modern educational goals and preparing students for real-world challenges.

References

[1] Chen, B. H., & Wu, Y. W. (2012). Interdisciplinary analysis of senior high school English textbooks—A case study of the People's Education Press compul-sory textbooks. Curricu-lum, Textbook, and Pedagogy, 32(4), 49-55..

[2] Chen, X. S. (2021). Practice and reflection on interdisciplinary integrated teaching. Modern Vocational Education, (39), 62-63.

[3] Fan, L., & Zhang, Q. Y. (2003). The integration of constructivist teaching the-ory and Eng-lish teaching reform. Foreign Languages and Their Teaching, (4), 28-32.

[4] Guo, H. (2022). The significance and characteristics of interdisciplinary the-matic learning. Chinese Basic Education, (12), 17-20.

[5] Hui, J., & Schultz. (2005). Analysis of the concept and instructional design of interdiscipli-nary teaching in Germany. Global Education Outlook, 34(8), 28-32.

[6] Huang, Y. Z. (2003). On the integration of multiple intelligences theory and English teach-ing. Curriculum, Textbook, and Pedagogy, (11), 39-42.

[7] Liu, Z. L. (1993). Interdisciplinary research in the era of interdisciplinary sciences. Re-search on Science of Science, (2), 9-16.

[8] Ren, X. B. (2022). The connotation, difficulties, and breakthroughs of inter-disciplinary thematic teaching. Curriculum, Textbook, and Pedagogy, 42(4), 59-64+72.

[9] Tian, J., & Sun, Z. D. (2019). Misunderstandings and rational returns of inter-disciplinary teaching. Chinese Journal of Education, (4), 63-67.

[10] Wang, Y. T., & Wu, G. P. (2019). Finland's interdisciplinary literacy-based basic education curriculum reform and its enlightenment. Educational Theory and Practice, 39(2), 40-43.

[11] Wei. (2015). The development of environmental education in British prima-ry and sec-ondary schools in the 21st century. Foreign Primary and Secondary Education, (9), 23-28+12.

[12] Yu, G. W., & Cao, Y. M. (2017). Interdisciplinary teaching research: A case study of Finland's phenomenon-based teaching. Foreign Primary and Secondary Education, (7), 57.

[13] Zhang, H. Y. (2008). A brief analysis of interdisciplinary curriculum models in American primary and secondary schools. Foreign Education Research, (8), 71-74.

[14] Zhou, J. W., & Wang, Z. H. (2018). Building a curriculum system based on core literacy—A review of Finland's National Core Curriculum for Basic Educa-tion 2014. Comparative Education Review, 40(11), 91-97.