Metaphors in Chinese Funeral Culture: The Interweaving of Life and Death, Kinship, and Morality

Authors

  • Ning Lv Tianjin Foreign Studies University, Tianjin 300204, China Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63313/LHP.8035

Keywords:

Funeral Culture, Cultural Metaphor, Conception of Life and Death, Family Ethics, Ritual Symbolism

Abstract

Chinese funeral culture abounds in metaphorical expressions and symbolic practices, such as returning to the great house, serving the dead as if they were living, the five-grade mourning system, and the final verdict on a persons life. These metaphors are not merely rhetorical devices but deep-seated forms of cultural cognition. From the perspective of cultural metaphor theory, this study analyzes the linguistic expressions and ritual behaviors in Chinese funerals and explores how they reflect Chinese understandings of life and death, kinship, and morality. The findings are as follows. In the dimension of life and death, metaphors such as serving the dead as if they were living and returning to the great house reconfigure death as the migration and settlement of the soul rather than the end of existence. In the dimension of kinship and family, the five-grade mourning system translates blood relationships into a visible, embodied sign system, thereby confirming and reinforcing family ties. In the dimension of morality, metaphors such as cautious attention to the end and continuing reverence for the distant and the final verdict transform funeral rituals into a practical site for moral instruction and social evaluation. At the social level, the funeral reenacts the differential mode of association in ritualized form, facilitating the integration of social relations and the reproduction of social order. Taken together, the metaphorical system in Chinese funeral culture constitutes a deep-seated cultural logic concerning the continuity of life, ethical order, and social integration.

References

[1] 束定芳. 隐喻学研究[M]. 上海: 上海外语教育出版社, 2000: 28-35.

[2] 郭于华. 死的困扰与生的执著: 中国民间丧葬仪礼与传统生死观[M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 1992: 19-24, 87-96, 152-158.

[3] 冯智明. 身体实践、物象隐喻与仪式过渡: 桂北红瑶“送梅山”葬礼研究[J]. 宗教学研究, 2021(1): 142-148.

[4] 王夫子. 殡葬文化学[M]. 长沙: 湖南大学出版社, 2007: 45-52, 103-110.

[5] Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. (1980) Metaphors We Live By[M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

[6] 钟敬文. 民俗学概论[M]. 上海: 上海文艺出版社, 1998: 178-185.

[7] 陈绪波. 先秦儒家死亡观念探析——以《士丧礼》为中心[J]. 国际社会科学杂志(中文版), 2022, 39(4): 112-120.

[8] 万建中. 中国民间禁忌风俗[M]. 北京: 中央编译出版社, 2005: 256-260.

[9] 何九盈. 汉字文化学[M]. 沈阳: 辽宁人民出版社, 2000: 210-215.

[10] 孟庆楠. 人伦的更迭与延续: 围绕冠、婚、丧、祭之礼的考察[J]. 道德与文明, 2022(4): 56-63.

[11] 丁凌华. 中国丧服制度史[M]. 上海: 上海人民出版社, 2000: 33-41.

[12] 徐吉军, 贺云翱. 中国丧葬礼俗[M]. 杭州: 浙江人民出版社, 1992: 145-153.

[13] 李伯森. 中国殡葬史(第一卷)[M]. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社, 2017: 224-231.

[14] 李景林. 儒家的丧祭理论与终极关怀[J]. 中国社会科学, 2004(2): 56-66.

[15] 肖群忠. 孝与中国文化[M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 2002: 120-128.

[16] 费孝通. 乡土中国[M]. 北京: 生活·读书·新知三联书店, 1985: 23-30.

[17] 哈维兰. 文化人类学[M]. 瞿铁鹏, 张钰, 译. 上海: 上海社会科学院出版社, 2006: 34.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-30

How to Cite

Metaphors in Chinese Funeral Culture: The Interweaving of Life and Death, Kinship, and Morality. (2026). 文史哲论丛, 1(3), 62-66. https://doi.org/10.63313/LHP.8035