Reflections on the Scope of Rights Holders in Securities Representative Litigation
— Insights from the Kangmei Pharmaceutical Case
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63313/Law.8020Keywords:
Securities Representative Litigation, Rights Protection, The Case of False Statements By Kangmei Pharmaceutical CompanyAbstract
The Kangmei Pharmaceutical case, as the most representative example of securities representative litigation, has opened up a new situation where representative litigation, which had long been on hold in China, has been activated. It holds significant value for the activation of representative litigation. However, in reality, the application of representative litigation still faces many complex issues, such as who initiates the representative litigation, how to determine the jurisdiction of the court, and the effect of the judgment. Solving these problems is not something that can be achieved overnight but requires a step-by-step approach and multi-faceted arguments. Due to space limitations, this article will focus on the scope of rights holders in securities representative litigation based on the particularity of the securities market, with the aim of providing some thoughts on how representative litigation can better protect the rights and interests of small and medium-sized investors.
References
[1] 刘哲玮.证券代表人诉讼中权利人范围确定程序的检讨与展望——从康美药业案展开[J].中国法律评论,2022,1:110-113.
[2] 林文学,付金联等.《关于证券纠纷代表人诉讼若干问题的规定》的理解与适用[J].人民司法,2020,28.
[3] 马德水,李雪晴,靳芷昕.新《证券法》下投服中心持股行权与中小投资者保护——以康美药业特别代表人诉讼案为例[J].财会月刊,2023.20:123-124.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 by author(s) and Erytis Publishing Limited.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.







