Research on the Electronic Service System in Civil Procedure
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63313/Law.8019Keywords:
Electronic Service, Civil Procedure, Smart Courts, Service RulesAbstract
With the rapid development of network information technology and the deepening of judicial digital transformation, electronic service, as an important institution in civil procedure, has made significant progress in both legislation and judicial practice. This paper systematically reviews the value advantages of the electronic service system, including reducing judicial costs, improving service efficiency, and enhancing party satisfaction. However, the current electronic service system still faces challenges such as poor operability of rules, narrow scope of application, and immature platform technology, which hinder its full functionality. To address these issues, this paper proposes institutional improvements from three aspects: refining electronic service rules, expanding the scope of application, and upgrading service platforms. Specific measures include establishing systematic, standardized, and detailed rules; creating a mandatory electronic service mechanism and promoting two-way service interaction; building a unified national electronic service platform, introducing blockchain technology to improve security and confidentiality, and enhancing integration with commonly used communication tools such as WeChat and SMS. This study aims to provide theoretical support and practical pathways for improving China’s electronic service system in civil procedure, thereby advancing the development of smart courts and judicial modernization.
References
[1] 邓恒, 董朝阳. 民事诉讼电子送达规则改造及其路径[J]. 湘潭大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2022(3): 47.
[2] 杜伟杰. 直接电子送达的基础证成与实现进路——以微信、支付宝为电子送达接收端的应用图景[J]. 山东法官培训学院学报, 2021(6): 136.
[3] 赵婷. 人工智能技术引人民事送达的“双相障碍”及其因应[J]. 长江论坛, 2021(4): 92.
[4] 陈锦波. 电子送达的实践图景与规范体系[J]. 浙江学刊, 2020(1): 145.
[5] 韩雪艳, 王旺. 电子送达当事人同意原则的检视与完善[J]. 人民司法, 2021(25): 18.
[6] 陈珊彬, 任永乐. 从被动适用到主动适用:基于大数据应用的电子送达制度完善与路径重塑[J]. 法治社会, 2019(6): 104.
[7] 刘向琼, 刘鸣君. 论我国民事诉讼电子送达制度的现状及其完善[J]. 法律适用, 2018(3): 36.
[8] 张兴美. 送达制度的结构性转向 从“结果型”走向“过程型”[J]. 中外法学, 2022(5): 1273.
[9] 谢登科. 在线诉讼的中国模式与未来发展[J]. 中国应用法学, 2022(4): 154.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 by author(s) and Erytis Publishing Limited.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.







