Analysis of EU Artificial Intelligence Policy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63313/CS.8014Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence Policy, Digital Sovereignty, Artificial Intelligence Security Governance, The Artificial Intelligence ActAbstract
In the race for leadership in emerging technologies typified by artificial intelligence (AI), the European Union (EU) stands out as one of the pioneering regional cooperation organizations to embark on AI safety governance[1].With digital technologies becoming increasingly politicized and securitized, the dynamics of competition and cooperation in the digital sphere are more and more shaped by security considerations. Consequently, the EU's emphasis on digital security governance has progressively pivoted from data protection towards the establishment of digital sovereignty[2]. Amidst the evolution of AI policies from soft law to hard law, the EU is poised to reassert the Brussels effect, enhancing the application of digital security governance in AI and other realms, fostering the creation of a more cohesive policy framework and maximizing the realization of the European digital single market strategy. Against this backdrop, China should ground in its own realities, adopt a dialectical approach to appraising the merits and demerits of the EU's AI legislation, assimilating the valuable insights, and prudently deliberating on the trajectory for China's future AI governance.
References
[1] 吴艳,刘腾龙.欧盟人工智能安全治理的路径与前景[J].湖北社会科学,2024,(12):32-41.
[2] 孙通,舒伟超.从数据保护到数字主权构建:欧盟数字安全治理的历程、动力与限度[J].世界经济与政治论坛,2025,(01):56-75+172.
[3] 刘子婧.欧盟《人工智能法》:演进、规则与启示[J].德国研究,2024,39(03):101-128+151.
[4] 张晨钰.欧盟人工智能政策分析[D].外交学院,2024.
[5] 王天凡.人工智能监管的路径选择——欧盟《人工智能法》的范式、争议及影响[J].欧洲研究,2024,42(03):1-30+173.
[6] 陈少威,杨涛,贾开.比较政策研究视野下全球人工智能治理模式的差异、共识与改革启示[J].中国行政管理,2024,40(12):15-24.
[7] European Parliament and Council. (2016). Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation). Official Journal of the European Union, L 119, 1–88.
[8] European Commission. (2016). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: A Digital Single Market Strategy for Europe. COM(2015) 192 final
[9] European Commission. (2018). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: A European Strategy for Data. COM(2020) 66 final.
[10] 李凯莉.《人工智能法案》对欧盟数字主权构建的回应及成效[J].政法论丛,2025,(02):156-169.
[11] 周文泓,杨璐羽,吴一凡.欧盟数据政策体系研究及其启示[J].情报理论与实践,2025,48(01):184-192+204.
[12] 丁纯,张亚妮,纪昊楠.欧洲数字单一市场的实践成效[J].现代国际关系,2025,(01):86-104+148.
[13] Bradford, Anu, The Brussels Effect: How the European Union Rules the World (New York, 2020; online edn, Oxford Academic, 19 Dec. 2019), https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190088583.001.0001, accessed 6 May 2025.
[14] 易学文.论“监管沙盒”制度的实践哲学转向——以欧盟《人工智能法》为分析对象[J].南海法学,2023,(02):7(4):11-19.
[15] 张广伟.欧盟人工智能监管沙盒制度的功能、局限及其启示——基于欧盟《人工智能法》的解析[J]. 德国研究,2024.39(2):116-132,136
[16] 张苑,瞿晶晶,张晅昱.人工智能监管沙盒:概念界定、实践经验及对我国的启示[J/OL]. 世界科技研究与发展,2024.1-9
[17] 黄静怡.“分级分类”与“契约”风险治理并行的人工智能监管制度构建——以欧盟《人工智能法案》为分析对象[J]. 海南金融,2024.(2):76-85
[18] 张辛鑫,冀瑜.论欧盟《人工智能法案》中的标准化模式及对我国启示[J]. 标准科学,2024.(5):39-46
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 by author(s) and Erytis Publishing Limited.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.